UW could look at more things it can do to be effective and environmentally progressive. I am not following the news welll on the future of Charter St Heating Plant, but hope that it will be changed soon since its pollution is violating the law.
Also UW could investigate the possibility of geothermal energy to heat/cool buildings.
I know some scientists did cogen feasibility study even in 70s. We could look at steam pipes in buildings if they could be used to retro-fit for geothermal use. We could invite out-side of UW people (scientists, engineers, etc.) to look into projects that UW could pursue.
Then UW can be competitive, could attract interested/motivated students more, and could get income through WARF, or could get “rich” simply propagating useful ideas to the world.
Thanks.
]]>I attended UW as an undergraduate 30 years ago, have a daughter currently enrolled, and myself transferred to the law school this fall. It is discouraging to note all the building on campus when funds for instruction and financial aid are so lacking. I am familiar with the argument that the funds for building are earmarked by donors and cannot be utilized for other purposes. I would like to see the university do some educating of these donors in their fund-raising campaigns. The university should do more to emphasize legacies that invest in people by financing instructional chairs, scholarships, and instructional equipment.
Public service should be encouraged within the student body, but should be modeled first by the university. Just yesterday a professor related that the School of Business would not assist with a continuing education seminar the law school was conducting for public servants unless (steeply) compensated. The School of Business related they didn’t do anything for free. My professor said he would not be trying the interdisciplinary approach again. Our public university should be on the fore of using its expertise to assist government to be its best. The university’s profit should come from the private, for profit sector of our economy not the public who funds its very existence.
]]>Here are her exact words: “In order to ensure that you can take part in these kinds of discussions, I will also organize one for the beginning of next semester as well and will inform you in advance of the date, time, and location. I hope to see many of you this next week and many more of you at the beginning of Spring semester.”
I find it disappointing that the way I was notified of the fourth forum was by searching for it on the Wisconsin website. The Chancellor did not contact myself or any student leaders in the Student Government to attempt to inform students about this fourth forum. This makes her message to students, which ASM sent out for her, seem somewhat disingenuous.
Hopefully the Chancellor’s office intended to send this out in some other capacity to students to inform them of the forum.
]]>